crossposted from
lj_releases
Oct. 30th, 2012 01:51 pmI'm very aware that the owners of LiveJournal have plans for the site that disregard, and dismiss as petty and irrelevant, every wish and preference of the users who have been part of LiveJournal for up to a decade. Purchase with the intent of remaking the site into a copy of other social networks, for non-US users who, for some reason, can't seem to access or master Twitter, Facebook, or Tumblr has always been the intended goal, even before the point of purchase--was in fact, the purpose of the purchase.
It's crystal clear the owners regard their own agenda far above the knowledge that LiveJournal, even with the changes to date, is a unique entity, with useability and functions that no other site combines. But rather than valueing this uniqueness, the owners seek to remove the functionaltiy and features that have made LiveJournal the mecca it has been, and turn it into just another social network, the aim of which seems to be "I have more people following my LJ than you do!" Just like Tumblr, Twitter and FB, quantity, not quality.
This last bastion of in-depth, thoughtful discussion and creativity must be sacrificed to the instant newsbites and superficial popularity that passes for social contact on every other online social site, whether that's because the owners want the prestige of owning and controlling the next Twitter, Tumblr, etc., or whether there's a "need" in Russia for yet *another* social network--is it a competition? To have the "most used" or "most popular" social network? Does the owner get a prize if he "wins"?
In any case, I won't be the only former user mourning the site that Live Journal used to be, and the communities, conversations, and discussions that have gone on here, in my LJ and in others', over most of a decade.
My quandary now is, do I pay for another year for my journals? Some of them? Or do I let them all go and seek some other shelter for the things for which I've depended on LiveJournal?
It's crystal clear the owners regard their own agenda far above the knowledge that LiveJournal, even with the changes to date, is a unique entity, with useability and functions that no other site combines. But rather than valueing this uniqueness, the owners seek to remove the functionaltiy and features that have made LiveJournal the mecca it has been, and turn it into just another social network, the aim of which seems to be "I have more people following my LJ than you do!" Just like Tumblr, Twitter and FB, quantity, not quality.
This last bastion of in-depth, thoughtful discussion and creativity must be sacrificed to the instant newsbites and superficial popularity that passes for social contact on every other online social site, whether that's because the owners want the prestige of owning and controlling the next Twitter, Tumblr, etc., or whether there's a "need" in Russia for yet *another* social network--is it a competition? To have the "most used" or "most popular" social network? Does the owner get a prize if he "wins"?
In any case, I won't be the only former user mourning the site that Live Journal used to be, and the communities, conversations, and discussions that have gone on here, in my LJ and in others', over most of a decade.
My quandary now is, do I pay for another year for my journals? Some of them? Or do I let them all go and seek some other shelter for the things for which I've depended on LiveJournal?
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 10:34 am (UTC)It's so arrogant, like they despise their core users. They obviously don't want us here.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 05:01 pm (UTC)I'll maintain a presence here as long as there's a community I'm familiar with. But I don't like the changes. When they do away with paid accounts, I don't know if I can endure the ads to continue to touch base with my LJ peeps. I've been exploring other sites, hoping to migrate "my" communities intact, and so far, Dreamwidth seems the closest equivalent, though many of the people I know have moved to Tumblr. (I have a Tumblr, I just use it very differently from my LJ and DW accounts, and am not sure I can tailor it to fannish pursuits).
It's very upsetting, and right now what I see is more loss than upside. But then I'm a dedicated pessimist, and I could always be proven wrong (Somebody please prove me wrong!).
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 11:33 pm (UTC)Dreamwidth seems okay, although I've not used it much. I imported my whole LJ over to DW with no problem so it should be okay.
I don't want a Tumblr account, it doesn't work the way I want.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 01:23 pm (UTC)New LJ changes threaten the essential core of LJ.... : (
Date: 2012-10-31 01:31 pm (UTC)Re: New LJ changes threaten the essential core of LJ.... : (
Date: 2012-10-31 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 02:09 pm (UTC)So what is it that I am not understanding about the changes that turns LJ into a Tumblr-eque place? (I frigging dislike tumblr by the way, so am quitw anxious now!)
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 04:52 pm (UTC)One of the chief features is a popularity rating which users can constantly monitor. It's a sign of prestige if you have hundreds on your flist--if your LJ is more widely read than others', and that competition for followers is heavily pushed on the new LJ.
Fic and meta discussion of tv shows, many if not all of which are unavailable in Russia, is a small enough proportion of users to be negligible in the balance of what Russians desire as a social website, so those users' preferences are easily sacrificed in reorganizing the site. The owners don't care about our money any more than they care about our preferences. Their aim and their goal is to provide the premiere social network for Russia and its neighbors, to earn the reputation of being the Number One online place people go to "connect" and update each other on social and political issues.
The dichotomy for me is, I understand, and even applaud their efforts and intentions. I just hate that it's *my* LJ that has to be sacrificed to do it.
The friends page is the most dramatic so far in the list of intended and unavoidable changes. Paid accounts are apparently being done away with in spring, and eventually your personal LJ page will be uniform, and the same as your friends page. With no paid accounts, it would be pointless for users to be allowed space for more than one identifying icon, so that's another feature I suspect will be sacrificed. Rolling page views and photo storage are the ultimate goals in redesigning the sites.
I may have some of my facts wrong, and you might want to check the last several posts in
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 05:19 pm (UTC)I wonder if Dreamwidth would be able to enhance the parts of it that are not quite up to LJ's standards to step in to the breach...
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 02:12 pm (UTC)Here I had just been contemplating switching to a paid account. Now I guess it's out of my hands.
I really appreciate you making their intentions known to the rest of us. I will certainly complain long and loud as well. LJ is unique. There's nothing out there that does what it does, and allows us to share the way we do. But I'm sure they see it as just an investment, and given the kind of money that's being made of FB (I'm still not sure where the money comes in at Tumblr), I guess they are only thinking about the financial aspect. They don't mind selling us down the river.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 05:08 pm (UTC)I think rather than bailing a sinking boat, fannish LJ communities would spend their energies better finding an alternative site to relocate. Dreamwidth is a near-clone, without a lot of the system failures LJ has had. It was founded and funded by fannish types, and serves fannish needs. Its architecture was built on LJ's skeleton and user functionality is almost identical--with none of the negative changes made to LJ in the last couple of years.
A lot of my fannish peeps have migrated to Tumblr, but I use my Tumblr differently than my LJ and DW, and I'm not sure I could acclimate to a fannish Tumblr. But there has to be an alternative, because the LJ we know, that has been fannishly usable, is going away.
I know several of the challeges have mirror accounts at both DW and Tumblr, so that's a start, at least.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 05:27 pm (UTC)I just opened a DW account myself, and I'm going to start crossposting from this account as well as Cheebles. From reading comments on the LJ changes, it looks like that's where most LJ users are looking at migrating to. I'll be bangingpatchouli there as I am on Tumblr.
I'm hoping to find more and more of my favorite LJ accounts there.
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 03:45 pm (UTC)Why does every 'Improvement' always seem like we're losing out?!
no subject
Date: 2012-10-31 06:58 pm (UTC)